| |
Donor and External Relations Section
DONOR AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS
|
| Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| General Service |
- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Total |
- |
3 |
5 |
8 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
456,063 |
828,724 |
1,284,787 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
37,290 |
125,826 |
163,116 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
493,353 |
954,550 |
1,447,903 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
1,447,903 |
|
NEW YORK
|
| Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
2 |
- |
2 |
| General Service |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
| Total |
- |
3 |
- |
3 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
456,063 |
- |
456,063 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
37,290 |
- |
37,290 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
493,353 |
- |
493,353 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
493,353 |
|
GENEVA
|
| Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
- |
3 |
3 |
| General Service |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
| Total |
- |
- |
5 |
5 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
828,724 |
828,724 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
125,826 |
125,826 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
- |
954,550 |
954,550 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
954,550 |
|
Within the context of ongoing humanitarian reform initiatives and
in addition to its core responsibilityto mobilize adequate resources
for OCHA’s activities, the Donor and External Relations Section
(DERS) will play an active role in promoting donor and government
support for the Humanitarian Response Review to Member States and
in mobilizing donor support for the Central Emergency Response Fund
(CERF). It will also intensify its efforts to broaden partnerships
and develop closer relations with developing countries and the private
sector.
The Section, in both Geneva and New York, assists the Senior Management
Team (SMT) in managing relationships with a great range of partners,
including governments, regional groups, G-77, parliamentarians,
foundations and the private sector. While the Donor and External
Relations functions have been combined into one section in New York,
they are managed by two distinct sections in Geneva: the Donor Relations
Section (DRS) and the Advocacy and External Relations Section (AERS).
The Donor Relations component is responsible for resource mobilization
and donor reporting activities. It also provides advice on resource
allocations and serves as the main entry point for the OCHA Donor
Support Group (ODSG) and the Humanitarian Liaison Working Group
(HLWG). The external relations component is in charge of relationships
with the G-77, regional groups, academia, parliamentarians, non-governmental
organisations, and the corporate sector.
In 2006, the Section will have three key priorities: to enhance
donor support and broaden the donor base;to strengthen partnerships
with Member States; and to better harness the potential of private
engagement.
Enhancing Donor Support and Broadening the Donor Base
Despite some progress in obtaining a greater share of the Regular
Budget, OCHA continues to depend heavily on extra-budgetary resources.
DERS fundraising efforts will therefore remain central to securing
timely and flexible funding for both headquarters and field activities.
In 2006, the Section will build upon existing relationships with
traditional partners and expand the donor base, targeting select
developing countries and emerging economies.
Accurate and timely reporting to donors on the utilization of
their contributions will remain an important responsibility of the
Section, despite the increased number of donors who have signed
up to the Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) initiative for harmonization
of reporting requirements. The Section will continue to serve as
focal point within OCHA for relations with Member States and will
play the leading role in providing advice to the Senior Management
Team on policy issues relevant for interaction with donors and resource
mobilization.
Strengthening Partnerships with Member States
Recent large-scale disasters have led to the direct engagement
of many countries and other partners in humanitarian assistance.
This has spurred increased interest in the international disaster
response system and has created new opportunities for OCHA to mobilize
operational and financial resources from governments around the
world. In 2005, DERS engaged Member States on a regional basis to
galvanize support for humanitarian reforms, and the Section will
continue these activities throughout 2006.
As an entry point to OCHA, the Section is responsible for creating
an environment conducive to the development and maintaining of productive
relationships with Member States to create broader understanding
of the humanitarian agenda and increased support for the humanitarian
coordination system and disaster management capacity. The Section
will develop a strategy to engage in a dialogue with a number of
Member States or regional groups on humanitarian issues of mutual
interest.
Harnessing the Potential of Private Engagement
The response to recent natural disasters also has highlighted
the important role of individuals and corporations in support of
relief efforts worldwide. DERS has become more proactive in its
outreach to the private sector to diversify OCHA’s resource
base and garner support for the Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP)
and the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) on behalf of the
wider humanitarian system.
Donor and External Relations in New York and Advocacy and External
Relations in Geneva are supporting OCHA's efforts to form strategic
alliances with business groups such as the World Economic Forum
and the Business Roundtable, focused on disaster relief and preparedness.
In 2006, DERS will build on the partnership developed with the UN
Foundation, which has accepted to host an online donation facility
allowing citizens around the world to make donations to OCHA. The
Section also will maintain the on-line Orientation Guide, developed
together with the Global Compact, the UN Foundation for International
Partnerships and seven UN agencies, to help business identify ways
to support relief efforts and direct their donations to the appropriate
operational agency.
Activities:
- Promote a strong interface between OCHA and its donors by ensuring
that the approach to each donor is tailored, prioritised, and
consistent with overall OCHA goals, objectives and priorities,
in order to mobilize resources for OCHA’s activities. The
Section will also advocate for wider humanitarian action and support
by donors, in particular for neglected emergencies.
- Provide the Senior Management Team with updates on donor contributions
and analyses of funding trends on a quarterly basis as well as
donor analysis upon request.
- Create awareness of, and mobilize political and financial support
for, OCHA’s initiatives by building strategic relationships
with members of the G-77, CIS countries, the European Union accession
states, and the private sector.
- Devise an action plan for the SMT’s outreach to new partners
to promote a coherent and complementary approach to effective
humanitarian response.
- Support efforts by substantive sections of OCHA to mobilise
additional capacity from the corporatesector in areas such as
telecommunications, information management, logistics and public
information.
- Advocate for the increased predictability, flexibility, timeliness
and quality of financial resources available to OCHA, and for
the securing of a US$ 30 million budgetary cash reserve needed
to issue one year contracts and cover three month operating costs
for field offices.
Indicators:
- Increased funding from existing donors – in particular
from members of the OCHA Donor Support Group – by at least
ten percent over 2005.
- The budgetary cash reserve established and sufficient funds
received to allow for full replenishment before November 2006.
- Proportion of funding received against requirements in OCHA
in 2006 compared with previous year.
- Ten percent increase in portion of funds received unearmarked
by the end of 2006, at least 60 percent of total contributions
received in the first half of the year, and sufficient funds received
to cover one-year field staff contracts and three months of operational
costs.
- Increased number of non-traditional donors and corporate partners
providing financial and operational support to OCHA.

|
|