| |
Office of the Under-Secretary-General/
Emergency
Relief Coordinator;Assistant Secretary-General/Deputy
Emergency Relief Coordinator; Director,
New York; Director, Geneva
OFFICE OF THE USG/ERC; DERC, DIRECTOR OF NEW YORK, DIRECTOR GENEVA |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
11 |
13 |
10 |
34 |
| General Service |
5 |
14 |
2 |
21 |
| Total |
16 |
27 |
12 |
55 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
2,606,376 |
4,200,054 |
1,888,152 |
6,806,430 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
195,600 |
1,153,447 |
553,700 |
1,349,047 |
| Total costs (US$) |
2,801,976 |
5,353,501 |
2,441,852 |
1,734,684 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
7,795,353 |
|
OFFICE OF THE USG – nEW York |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
6 |
6 |
- |
12 |
| General Service |
3 |
6 |
- |
9 |
| Total |
9 |
12 |
- |
21 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
1,594,752 |
1,698,245 |
- |
3,292,997 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
155,700 |
444,090 |
- |
599,790 |
| Total costs (US$) |
1,750,452 |
2,142,335 |
- |
3,892,787 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
2,142,335 |
|
STRATEGIC PLANNING UNIT |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
| General Service |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| Total |
- |
- |
3 |
3 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
503,768 |
503,768 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
203,400 |
203,400 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
- |
707,168 |
707,168 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
707,168 |
|
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR – GENEVA |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
2 |
3 |
- |
5 |
| General Service |
2 |
5 |
- |
7 |
| Total |
4 |
8 |
- |
12 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
604,812 |
1,155,443 |
- |
1,760,255 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
39,900 |
443,129 |
- |
483,029 |
| Total costs (US$) |
644,712 |
1,598,572 |
- |
2,243,284 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
1,598,572 |
|
In support of OCHA's mission to mobilize and coordinate effective
and principled humanitarian action in line with resolution 46/182,
executive management's main role and mission is to provide leadership
to, and strategic direction for, OCHA and also serve as the main
communications link between OCHA and the Executive Office of the
Secretary-General and other UN departments, agencies, funds and
programmes. The USG/ERC will provide leadership to the International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), the Inter-Agency Standing
Committee (IASC) and the Executive Committee for Humanitarian
Affairs (ECHA).
OCHA's USG/ERC, ASG and Directors work in concert with OCHA's senior
management team (SMT) to ensure implementation of the USG/ERC's
strategic vision and the corporate strategic plan. The SMT is also
an advisory body to the USG/ERC, providing guidance on critical
coordination, policy, advocacy, information management, and internal
management issues. Within this overarching framework, the SMT is
guided by OCHA's strategic framework for 2007-09 and will support
the USG/ERC in translating OCHA's strategic vision into reality.
The strategic framework outlines an ambitious agenda for the coming
three years. The first of OCHA's two goals are externally-oriented,
reflecting OCHA's role in servicing, motivating and leading the broader
humanitarian community. The first goal is to consolidate humanitarian
reform to ensure a more adequate and relevant humanitarian response.
The second goal is to establish and affirm OCHA as a recognized leader
in humanitarian advocacy and policy. The third goal is more
internally-oriented, recognizing that internal reform must go
hand-in-hand with external reform, and focuses on creating a more
effective and efficient organization.
OCHA's executive management will achieve these goals by providing:
Proactive leadership on humanitarian reform:
OCHA's leadership will provide strategic stewardship internally but
also externally on all issues related to humanitarian reform. This will
be done in close collaboration with the relevant partners through such
mechanisms as the IASC/ ECHA and other new fora. A key objective for
2007 will be to consolidate the achievements made regarding the Central
Emergency Response Fund by ensuring the Fund delivers on its potential
and develops into a critical and timely humanitarian funding tool.
Senior management will work with senior officials in the agency and
donor community to promote the appropriate application, added-value
and funding of this mechanism. Regarding the newly introduced cluster
system, this approach will be fully tested in a set of pilot countries,
and applied more systematically in new emergencies. OCHA will work
through the IASC to ensure that the approach is continuously fine tuned
and adapted in line with field experiences. A second pillar of
humanitarian reform involves strengthening the Humanitarian Coordination
(HC) system. OCHA senior management is committed to providing strong
support for the leadership role of the HC, ensuring systematic training
for, and broadening the pool of Humanitarian Coordinators. Greater
engagement and coordination with NGOs is another critical element of
humanitarian reform. The initiative of the Global Humanitarian Platform
intends to strengthen the partnership between the UN and the NGOs,
and the Red Cross/Crescent movement for cooperation in humanitarian
action. OCHA senior management also seeks to play a proactive role
to ensure that humanitarian reform efforts and experiences are
synchronized with the overall UN reform efforts of the Secretary-General.
Recognized leadership role in humanitarian advocacy and policy:
This second goal reflects a critical core role of OCHA as embodied
by UN resolution 46/182. Recognizing gains made in previous years in
overall leadership, advocacy and policy, OCHA senior management will
focus on a few essential areas. A key element is the need for improved
analysis of global and country humanitarian trends and issues in order
to build the foundation for better informed early action, needs assessment,
decision-making and humanitarian financing. Under the leadership of
the SMT, a number of studies will be conducted in-house, and are meant
to translate into a much stronger, evidenced-based decision-making
platform supported by appropriate information technology. The USG/ERC
and senior managers will also provide leadership on key humanitarian
principles and issues, including more equitable and principled funding;
more attention to under-funded and neglected emergencies and vulnerable
groups; and more predictability in the way the broader humanitarian
community responds to the plights of millions of men, women and children
affected by disasters and complex emergencies. Such advocacy will be
undertaken through broadened outreach to media world-wide, including
managers speaking out on behalf of the humanitarian community, in-depth
interviews, special features on key concerns, and by increasing dialogue
with traditional and non-traditional partners, including the private
sector. OCHA senior management is also committed to ensuring follow-up
to the Kobe World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Additionally,
it will ensure that OCHA headquarters and field managers promote the
incorporation of disaster risk reduction into their own work as well
as into the work of partners. In this regard, senior management has
decided to strengthen the early warning, preparedness, capacity
building and contingency planning capacity of OCHA.
Turning OCHA into a more effective and efficient organization:
OCHA's role in recent years has expanded, and so has its field
presence, staffing and financing. Yet, the humanitarian reform agenda
has not been matched by a full internal realignment to ensure capacity
for its full support above and beyond OCHA's regular work. The recent
realignment between and within the New York and Geneva offices is
designed to provide better synergies and develop this capacity.
Senior management is committed to ensuring full implementation of the
2006 self-evaluation, the 2006 comprehensive enterprise risk management
exercise and a series of audits and evaluations. Key recommendations
made by these reviews have been incorporated into an internal "road map"
which allocates a lead implementation role to each relevant senior manager.
The SMT will be guided by a risk management framework and will focus
its work on a number of vital internal risk areas. The SMT will ensure
the strengthening of OCHA's administrative and management capacity,
including a more effective human resource planning and management
system, enhanced organizational structures and improved internal
communications. Special attention will be given to stronger
administrative capacity in the field offices. Beyond strengthening
administration and management, the establishment of a strategic planning
and reporting service with an embedded risk management function, will
also pave the way for a more accountable and results-oriented SMT.
With the support of this service, the SMT will use the newly introduced
mid-year and end-of year reviews to systematically monitor, assess and
adjust performance and priorities, and use the results from these
exercises to inform its strategies and funding for the coming year.
SMT also plans to use a set of corporate performance indicators to
exercise its broader oversight role. The adoption and implementation
of a corporate performance plan will be one of the key SMT outputs for
2007. A more systematic discussion and use of audit and evaluation
findings and recommendations will be another element of an improved
accountability mechanism, involving also a newly strengthened mid-level
management forum. In terms of funding, the SMT will strive for more
predictability and adequacy and will seek to achieve this through a
strengthened external relations branch in Geneva. In OCHA 2007 the
Regional Offices are featured as a more central part of OCHA's management.
These offices will be assuming central tasks that contribute to the
overall delivery of the OCHA objectives in 2007-2009.

Displacement and Protection Support Section
Displacement and Protection Support Section |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
11 |
13 |
10 |
34 |
| General Service |
5 |
14 |
2 |
21 |
| Total |
16 |
27 |
12 |
55 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
2,606,376 |
4,200,054 |
1,888,152 |
6,806,430 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
195,600 |
1,153,447 |
553,700 |
1,349,047 |
| Total costs (US$) |
2,801,976 |
5,353,501 |
2,441,852 |
1,734,684 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
7,795,353 |
|
In early 2007 the Inter-Agency Internal Displacement Division
(IDD) will be transformed into a Displacement and Protection Support
Section (DPSS) reporting to the Director, OCHA Geneva. This
strategic change builds on efforts made to strengthen and make more
predictable the inter-agency collaborative response to internal
displacement begun in 2005-2006. DPSS will aim to enhance
OCHA's ability to meet its strategic goals, while
strengthening inter-agency collaboration and response, in line with
humanitarian reform objectives.
DPSS will focus on: supporting the
mandate of the ERC to monitor and strengthen the inter-agency
response to internal displacement; supporting the implementation of
OCHA's Policy Instruction on protection at international and
field levels; and strengthening OCHA's capacity to incorporate
protection into core functions and coordination response.
Additionally, DPSS will focus on augmenting and maintaining
inter-agency capacity to respond to protection crises, particularly
situations of internal displacement, through management of the
ProCap initiative. This initiative is scheduled to remain under
OCHA auspices until March 2008.
DPSS will continue to provide
field-level support to Humanitarian Coordinators and OCHA field
offices in fulfillment of OCHA's General Assembly and
IASC-mandated responsibilities on internal displacement and
protection coordination in complex emergencies and natural
disasters.
The Internal Displacement Division has a three-pronged
strategy: 1) to advocate systemic level changes in the way agencies
respond to internal displacement 2) to provide field-level technical
advice, support and advocacy on protection and displacement issues;
and 3) to build an inter-agency protection standby capacity. DPSS
aims to follow through on many initiatives started under IDD's
auspices, while continuing to provide technical support to the field
on cross-cutting protection issues and internal displacement
concerns from a more integral position in OCHA.
Against this
background, DPSS's key objectives for 2007 are as follows:
Fully deployed, functioning and funded cluster system (in new
emergencies and countries selected by IASC): DPSS will provide
technical advice and support on cross-cutting displacement and
protection issues to HCs and field teams. Field-level lessons
learned exercises/reviews on protection and displacement issues will
be facilitated.
Strengthened in-country coordination: The Section
will develop new displacement and protection components for HC/RC
and EFCT/ UNDAC training/induction modules along with accompanying
guidance for the OCHA policy instruction on protection, which will
be developed and systematically disseminated in the field and at
HQs. Short-term emergency protection and displacement experts will
be deployed from DPSS to field offices.
Strengthened tools and
services: Senior Protection advisors will be deployed to the field
(through management of the ProCap Project). ProCap standby partners
and UN agencies will be trained on protection field craft and IASC
protection policies and the deployment of protection-trained standby
personnel will be coordinated and facilitated through the launch and
maintenance of ProCap Online. The number and diversity of
protection profiles in partners' standby rosters will be
increased. Displacement and protection concerns also will be fully
integrated in workplans for HQ Cluster Working Groups for Early
Recovery, Shelter and Camp Coordination Camp Management (CCCM).
Shared policy positions in pursuit of a common humanitarian
understanding and messaging: An inter-agency multi-year road-map
outlining a strategy to improve protection responses will be agreed
through the IASC, and the Handbook on Housing and Property
Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (Pinheiro Principles)
will be finalised and disseminated.
Improved coordination and
monitoring of IDP issues: Remaining gaps in the inter-agency
response to internal displacement will be identified and solutions
proposed; an inter-agency IDP profiling tool will be adopted and
rolled out; partnership modalities between CRD, OCHA field offices
and the Norwegian Refugee Council's (NRC) Internal
Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) to ensure improved IDP
information sharing will be clarified and advocacy on forgotten or
ignored IDP situations by the ERC, RSG, IASC or ECHA will be
undertaken.
Key Indicators for 2007
- Number and percent of humanitarian emergencies with clearly defined cluster leads for IDP protection, shelter and camp coordination/camp management
- Number of UNDAC Emergency Field Coordination Trainings (EFCT) using modules which incorporate field best practices on protection and displacement
- Number and percent of PROCAP deployments of Senior Protection Officers against requests from protection-mandated agencies or HC/UNCTs; increase in percent of stand-by personnel with non-European and non-North American nationality in existing rosters
- Adoption of inter-agency road map by the IASC
- Percent of recommendations on how to deal with remaining gaps addressed in the interagency response to internal displacement addressed by IASC

Emergency Preparedness Section
Emergency Preparedness Section |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
11 |
13 |
10 |
34 |
| General Service |
5 |
14 |
2 |
21 |
| Total |
16 |
27 |
12 |
55 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
2,606,376 |
4,200,054 |
1,888,152 |
6,806,430 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
195,600 |
1,153,447 |
553,700 |
1,349,047 |
| Total costs (US$) |
2,801,976 |
5,353,501 |
2,441,852 |
1,734,684 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
7,795,353 |
|
Recent large-scale disasters, such as the Indian Ocean Tsunami in
December 2004, Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and the South Asia
earthquake in October 2005 underline the need to strengthen disaster
preparedness activities. For OCHA to better monitor evolving trends
in high-risk countries, improve disaster response capacities, and
follow up on preparedness gaps we must better understand the causes
of disaster risk. Being prepared in an emergency can significantly
reduce loss of life, alleviate human suffering and contribute to
developing more resilient communities. OCHA has been making efforts
to work with the United Nations Country Teams (UNCT), the wider
humanitarian community, and governments in disaster-prone countries
to identify potential disaster risks and improve overall
preparedness levels.
OCHA's work in the area of disaster
preparedness, particularly at headquarters, has lacked dedicated
capacity. At the regional level some preliminary preparedness work
has been carried out, although it has been uneven in terms of scope
and quality. During the Global Management Retreat in June 2006, the
need for stronger OCHA involvement in the area of disaster
preparedness was recognized and managers agreed to devote more
attention and resources to this critical area of concern.
Furthermore, in the context of the Hyogo Framework for Action, OCHA
is accountable for disaster preparedness in support of governments.
For these reasons, a dedicated Emergency Preparedness Section (EPS)
has been created. EPS will play a catalytic role for sudden-onset
and slow-onset disaster preparedness within and outside OCHA,
providing necessary tools, guidance, policy and the overall
promotion of disaster preparedness, including through Early Warning
and Contingency Planning, particularly with respect to natural
disasters. In carrying out its work, EPS will work in close
coordination with CRD as well as with OCHA's branches and Regional
Offices, RC/HCs and UN Country Teams.
Working with the Coordination
and Response Division (CRD), the EPS will focus on high-risk
low-capacity regions, assisting OCHA to identify where and when
there is a risk of sudden-onset and slow-onset disasters, ensuring
that key risk factors are monitored, sharing timely and meaningful
information on trends in risk, mapping out and testing response
capacity and following up on preparedness gaps, including by
mainstreaming preparedness within OCHA.
OCHA is responsible for the
follow-up on the implementation of Priority 5 of the Hyogo Framework
for Action (Strengthened Disaster Preparedness for Response at all
Levels). As such, OCHA will work to develop synergies among UN
Agencies and other actors, assuming a greater role in supporting
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) activities and
its global, regional and thematic platforms, and international/
regional organisations and UN Country Teams as well as reporting to
the GA and ECOSOC. OCHA will also work with, and strongly support,
the IASC Sub-Working Group on Preparedness and Contingency Planning
in the area of natural disasters.
The EPS will focus on supporting
disaster preparedness work in a coherent and systematic manner at
all levels, in particular through OCHA's Regional Offices and
Regional Disaster Response Advisors (RDRAs). The Section will work
closely with all OCHA branches, in particular those charged with
emergency response, the Early Warning and Contingency Planning
Section (EWCP) and CRD Desk Officers. The EPS will assess OCHA's
preparedness activities and propose ways to improve them using where
appropriate, existing information, analysis and tools. A program of
action to facilitate the internal coordination and monitoring of
activities will be developed. Through its participation in the
Capacity for Disaster Reduction Initiative (CADRI) initiative, EPS
will support capacity building in disaster preparedness by
supporting training related activities.
Against this background,
EPS's key objectives in 2007 will be as follows:
Enhanced
organisational structures: EPS will enhance work among Regional
Offices by ensuring consistent policy and procedures related to
disaster preparedness and emergency response planning. Lessons
learnt exercises will be conducted periodically between Regional
Offices to share experiences in Early Warning. EPS will support
monitoring activities at regional level with the concerned Desk
Officers and ROs. EPS will also support the improvement of
Contingency Planning guidelines, leading to more effective
contingency planning and emergency simulations at field and regional
level.
Improved, and publicly profiled, analysis of global and
country humanitarian trends and issues: EPS will maximise the use
of existing in-house preparedness tools and assist in improving
their quality through needs assessment and feedback analysis of the
end-users community. EPS will support Desk Officers and ROs to
maintain up-to-date thematic, geographic and cyclical Disaster Risk
Profiles. The section will also ensure that the underlying disaster
risk factors are monitored by OCHA, and will share timely and
meaningful information on risk and response factors with partners.
More coherent and sharpened advocacy on humanitarian issues and
principles: The Section will collect, analyse and disseminate
information related to disaster preparedness and disaster risk
reduction. Disaster Risk Profiles and trends will be made available
for advocacy. EPS will document the issues and processes that are
essential to understand and work in the context of disaster risk
reduction and its advocacy.
Greater incorporation of risk reduction
objectives into humanitarian strategies:Preparedness work will be
based on disaster risk - the probability of a hazard occurring
crossed with the extent of population vulnerability. This work will
draw on existing analysis and tools where possible. The Section will
also improve organisational learning by compiling lessons learned
and best practices and translating this information into
recommendations that will allow the integration of disaster risk
reduction objectives into OCHA's activities and strategic planning.
In contributing to the training of staff, it will disseminate
innovative approaches and mainstream disaster preparedness issues.
The Section aims also to raise donors' awareness and gain support
for disaster preparedness projects. To these ends, EPS will work
closely with existing tools and initiatives, including the UNDP
Global Risk Identification Programme (GRIP), the World Bank Global
Natural Disaster Hotspots project and the CRED/EM-DAT International
Disaster Database.
Increased and strengthened partnerships for
humanitarian action: The Section will allow OCHA to engage in
constructive and continued dialogues with its partners at the
headquarters level, and to participate in the overall promotion of
priority five of the Hyogo Framework for Action. This partnership
will seek to achieve harmonized strategies and enhanced planning for
preparedness activities and joint action plans. EPS will also
strongly support the work of the IASC Sub-Working Group on
Preparedness and Contingency Planning, particularly in the area of
natural disasters.
Key Indicators for 2007
- Number of Contingency Planning and Simulation exercises supported.
- Number of up-to-date Disaster Risk profiles maintained in database.
- Number and percent of EPS recommendations translated into action.
- Number of staff trained in disaster risk reduction issues; percent of increase in donor contributions toward OCHA's disaster preparedness projects.
- Number of functioning partnerships in the area of disaster risk reduction.

|
|