| |
Policy Development and Studies Branch
PDSB – CONSOLIDATED |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
4 |
11 |
2 |
17 |
| General Service |
- |
5 |
2 |
7 |
| Total |
4 |
16 |
4 |
24 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
738,720 |
2,718,983 |
588,749 |
4,046,452 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
92,300 |
638,450 |
823,205 |
1,553,955 |
| Total costs (US$) |
831,020 |
3,357,433 |
1,411,954 |
5,600,407 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
4,769,387 |
|
PDSB – NEW YORK |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
4 |
9 |
2 |
15 |
| General Service |
- |
4 |
2 |
6 |
| Total |
4 |
13 |
4 |
21 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
738,720 |
2,075,968 |
588,749 |
3,403,437 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
92,300 |
477,990 |
823,205 |
1,393,495 |
| Total costs (US$) |
831,020 |
2,553,958 |
1,411,954 |
4,796,932 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
3,965,912 |
|
PDSB – GENEVA |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
2 |
- |
2 |
| General Service |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
| Total |
- |
3 |
- |
3 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
643,015 |
- |
643,015 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
160,460 |
- |
160,460 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
803,475 |
- |
803,475 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
803,475 |
|
The Policy Development and Studies Branch (PDSB) has as its main
role and mission to provide policy guidance and clarity on humanitarian
issues; support effective humanitarian action by being operationally
relevant and practical; and support OCHA's role in the broader
humanitarian community, particularly its mission to mobilize and
coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership
with national and international actors.
In 2007, PDSB will focus on three key areas: developing a humanitarian
policy agenda; fostering strategic and operational coherence; and
improving accountability and effectiveness.
To develop a humanitarian policy agenda, PDSB identifies emerging
trends and changes in the humanitarian environment and then works to
develop common or harmonized policy positions among humanitarian agencies
based on human rights, international law and humanitarian principles.
PDSB engages with Member States and UN bodies including the Economic
and Social Council (ECOSOC), the General Assembly and the Security
Council, and humanitarian and academic partners in order to promote
greater recognition and application of humanitarian principles.
To foster strategic and operational coherence, PDSB crafts practical
policies, guidance and analytical tools for use in the field by
humanitarian practitioners. It also develops aide memoirs and diagnostic
tools for political actors, such as Member States and peacekeepers,
to use during crisis management to help ensure consideration of key
humanitarian concerns. Additionally, PDSB contributes to the development
of training to ensure staff and other actors in emergencies are aware
of key humanitarian policies and methodologies and are able to apply
them flexibly, and appropriately, in varied contexts.
To improve accountability and effectiveness, PDSB initiates and
manages a portfolio of reviews and studies for OCHA and its humanitarian
partners. The focus of these evaluation activities is to promote internal
and sector-wide learning and accountability. Evaluation reports are
broadly disseminated and incorporated into new policies, lessons
learned documents and action plans. In an effort to improve the
results-orientation of OCHA, PDSB also assists the field and branches
with designing and implementing results-based monitoring and evaluation systems.
Against this background, PDSB's key objectives for 2007 are as follows:
Strengthened humanitarian reform through policy guidance: PDSB will provide policy support and guidance materials to the
cluster working groups (IASC) and the CERF Secretariat and Advisory
Board as well as a guidance note on the modalities of the Humanitarian
Community Partnership teams. PDSB will ensure standardized training
for OCHA staff and peacekeepers, and the establishment of a roster/surge
capacity for policy expertise.
Strengthened in-country coordination:
PDSB will ensure the following: two country level protection
workshops, four country reviews of integrated missions in relation
to humanitarian presence and principles; a review of the effectiveness
of the HC training; a mapping study of humanitarian and human rights
action to enhance protection; an internal review of OCHA's policy on
civil-military coordination and a review paper to enhance
relief-development synergies in slow-onset disasters. In support of
the CAPs, PDSB will produce new guidelines and training, provide
analysis on the reflection of critical policy issues in CAPs, and
develop standardized appeal projects for critical issues such as gender
and M&E.
Improved, and publicly profiled, analysis of global and
country humanitarian trends and issues, including those relevant to IDPs: PDSB will promote the roll-out of the protection information
mechanism in three pilot countries, a POC database, and the development
of an internal global IDP monitoring and reporting instrument and
three country-specific POC/IDP strategies.
Shared policy positions through strengthened partnerships: PDSB will develop policy papers on under-funded crises, targets
for low-profile crises, contribute to developing IASC policies on
gender, the elderly, and on HIV/AIDS. PDSB will support improved
policy dialogue on disasters within existing inter-governmental and
inter-agency processes, work with regional organizations on POC;
develop country-specific civil military/civil policy guidance, and
review the use of military assets.
Greater incorporation of risk reduction into humanitarian strategies: PDSB will develop disaster preparedness indicators and provide
policy guidance in this area.
Key Indicators for 2007
- Percent of PDSB-developed policy recommendations incorporated into humanitarian reform programmes
- Degree of satisfaction (survey) expressed by key stakeholders with guidelines developed by PDSB
- World Humanitarian Report concept endorsed by key stakeholders by end 2007
- Number and percent of partners agreeing to adopt proposed policy positions
- Adoption of disaster preparedness indicators by IASC by end 2007
OCHA's work on HIV/AIDS in humanitarian action
75% of the global burden (38.8 million) of HIV infection is found
in countries affected by complex and protracted crises. OCHA is
focusing on mainstreaming into humanitarian programmes actions that
address HIV, concentrating on three areas of concern:
- Complex Emergencies: Advocating for, and providing coordination
support to help ensure that populations in emergency settings are
able to access HIV prevention, care and treatment services.
- Protracted Emergencies: Ensuring linkages between humanitarian
action to address acute needs and development programs to address chronic needs.
- Sudden onset disasters: Integrating HIV considerations, as required,
in emergency response to reduce risk of increased HIV susceptibility
and AIDS vulnerability.
In late 2006, OCHA engaged its first HIV/AIDS Advisor to help
define OCHA's role in the global fight against HIV and to develop
policies and tools to guide OCHA HQ, regional and country activities.
In 2007, OCHA and UNAIDS are committed to developing a strategic
framework for the coordination of HIV support in emergency settings.
OCHA will also develop an HIV workplace program for OCHA staff.

Protection of Civilians Project
PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS PROJECT |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| General Service |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| Total |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
278,550 |
278,550 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
340,695 |
340,695 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
- |
619,245 |
619,245 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
619,245 |
|
The protection of civilians in armed conflict remains a central
part of the Policy Development and Studies Branch (PDSB) efforts to
support the humanitarian policy agenda and foster strategic and operational
coherence within the Secretariat, the IASC and Member States.
Increasingly, many crises around the world can be described as
protection crises, characterized less by dire emergency need and more
by violations of human rights and attacks against civilian populations.
The protection of civilians in armed conflict is a 'humanitarian imperative'
that remains a principal international concern. On behalf of the
humanitarian community, the Emergency Relief Coordinator continues
to brief the Security Council on a six month basis with a Secretary-General's
report submitted every 18 months. In 2006, a third thematic resolution
on the protection of civilians in armed conflict was adopted by the
Security Council, complementing two prior resolutions and strengthening
the overall protection framework. In 2007, the Protection of Civilians
Project will focus on strengthening the implementation of these resolutions
and enhancing protection response to safeguard civilians caught in conflict.
The Ten Point Platform of key issues of concern, presented to the
Security Council in December 2003, remains relevant today and will
continue to provide a solid basis on which to promote the protection
of civilians in armed conflict. The Project will also engage more
closely with the Member State Support Group and members of the Security
Council to develop a clearer strategy for engaging Member States to
advance the protection agenda.
In 2007 the project will continue to encourage broader participation
and support for the humanitarian protection of civilians in armed
conflict by reaching out to new constituents, principally regional and
other inter-governmental organizations, and developing guidance and
tools to ensure more effective field support.
A workshop is planned for early 2007, to consolidate the consultative
network of regional organizations already established, and set the
agenda for establishing a common set of standards for regional organizations
on the protection of civilians in armed conflict.
In collaboration with other partners and country teams, work will
also continue on strengthening field response through country level
workshops. In 2006 a roundtable session on the peacekeeping mission
in Côte d'Ivoire was convened, followed by a protection of civilians
workshop. This approach will continue to be applied in 2007 with a
possible focus on Afghanistan. The country workshops aim to bring
together national authorities, representatives of civil society,
international NGOs, UN Agencies, peacekeeping missions, regional
organizations, and donors. With a country focus, the workshops aim
to define country policies and strategies to strengthen the protection
of civilians in post-conflict situations as well as provide participants
with tools to enhance their capacity to respond to protection needs
and integrate protection considerations into all aspects of their work.
Against this background, the Protection of Civilians Project's
key objectives for 2007 are as follows:
Shared policy positions (in pursuit of a common humanitarian
understanding and messaging): Emphasis will be placed on strengthening protection response and
implementation of already developed protection frameworks. A policy
instruction on protection has been formulated for OCHA field offices
and efforts will be made to ensure that all OCHA offices receive
sufficient guidance and have the capacity to support the work of the
protection cluster at the field level.
More coherent and sharpened advocacy on humanitarian issues and principles: The project will work with DPKO and IASC colleagues to develop
clearer guidance on the role of peacekeepers and other actors in
peacekeeping missions. It will also work closely with Member States
to strengthen the implementation of the protection of civilians
Security Council resolutions by mobilizing the Member States Support
Group on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. Emphasis will
also be placed on updating and promoting the use of existing tools
such as the Aide Memoire.
Improved, and publicly profiled, analysis of global and
country humanitarian trends and issues: The project will continue developing an enhanced information
mechanism on the protection of civilians in armed conflicts. Stronger
links will be made with academic institutions and the focus will be
placed on rolling out a basic methodology to enhance information
gathering on protection related issues. This will complement existing
mechanisms already established at the field level and will be developed
in line with IASC's information management strategy.
Key Indicators for 2007
- Number of advocacy events on the protection of civilians in armed conflict held in collaboration with NGOs & Member States
- Number of Regional Organisations engaged in the Protection of Civilians Consultative Network
- Number of OCHA field offices with established protection of civilians reporting mechanisms

Evaluation and Studies Section Project
EVALUATION AND STUDIES SECTION |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| General Service |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Total |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
411,885 |
411,885 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
- |
411,885 |
411,885 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
411,885 |
|
The Evaluation and Studies Section Project (ESS) is responsible
for the management of a portfolio of evaluations and reviews, including
lessons learned. These are undertaken on cross-cutting, thematic and
country-specific issues and, at times, are conducted in collaboration
with other UN agencies and members of the IASC. The ESS also contributes
to corporate reporting (e.g. Annual Report, UN report, ECOSOC reporting)
and is the depository for institutional learning.
The Section strives to balance the systematic planning of on-going
evaluation initiatives which are expected to contribute to OCHA-wide
learning and increased organizational effectiveness, with the ad-hoc
planning of unforeseen initiatives that require a timely response,
such as real-time evaluations. The work plan therefore must remain
flexible to allow for additional evaluation activities and the
re-prioritization of activities when necessary. The ESS also seeks
to strengthen OCHA-specific and system-wide monitoring and evaluation
(M&E) systems capacity but faces major challenges related to field
and headquarter capacity and lack of effective data coming out of
emergency settings. This challenge can only be addressed by a system-wide
effort and collaboration, which ESS is spearheading. Finally,
institutional knowledge learning and sharing is not systematized and
easily accessible to all staff. The ESS therefore needs to work in
collaboration with other parts of OCHA as well as agency partners
to build internal and external knowledge sharing networks.
Against this background, ESS's key objectives for 2007 are as follows:
Strengthened implementation of humanitarian reform: ESS will conduct two external reviews of the CERF and the cluster
approach, an internal review of UNDAC and two inter-agency evaluations;
a consolidated appeal with focus on tools and humanitarian reform issues;
and participation in a system-wide evaluation by the UN Evaluation
Group (UNEG) on the overall UN's performance in Uganda. OCHA's role
here will be to ensure that humanitarian issues, including those
related to the reform, are addressed by this system-wide evaluation.
Improved tools and services: ESS will focus on the development of a standardized M&E component
for flash appeals and consolidated appeals, the setting-up of an
M&E surge capacity; the piloting of the CAP strategic monitoring
and evaluation tool in three countries, and a CAP evaluation.
More coherent and sharpened advocacy on humanitarian issues and principles: ESS will ensure the recommendations made in the synthesis report
of the Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC) are promoted and discussed
at the appropriate fora, leading to implementation. Together with
IASC partners, ESS will be co-organizing a West African meeting of
ALNAP (Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance
in Humanitarian Action) to bring together various partners to discuss
critical issues for the region.
Improving management practices: ESS will organize at least two systematic and focused internal
lesson learning reviews (LLRs) of new large-scale emergency responses.
It will conduct follow-ups and trend-reviews on the implementation
of previous LLRs.
Key indicators for 2007
- Number and percent of evaluation recommendations that are implemented
- Number and percent of new CAPs and Flash Appeals that contain the new standardized M&E component
- Number of agencies that have agreed to implement TEC recommendations
- Percent of lesson learning review implementations that are implemented

Gender Equality Project
GENDER EQUALITY PROJECT |
Planned Staffing |
Regular Budget |
Extra-budgetary |
Projects |
Total |
|
| Professional |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| General Service |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| Total |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
|
| Staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
310,199 |
310,199 |
| Non-staff costs (US$) |
- |
- |
70,625 |
70,625 |
| Total costs (US$) |
- |
- |
380,824 |
380,824 |
|
| Total requested (US$) |
|
|
|
380,824 |
|
The Gender Advisory Team of OCHA (GAT) is responsible for
mainstreaming gender concerns into OCHA's core mandate and supporting
the implementation of OCHA's Policy on Gender Equality and its
supporting Plan of Action. Facilitating gender mainstreaming throughout
the IASC, including in all aspects of the humanitarian reform, is
a major area of concentration for OCHA's Gender Equality Project.
In 2006, OCHA led the IASC through the development of a Five Point
Strategy to strengthen gender mainstreaming in humanitarian action.
The first initiative of this strategy - the development of gender
standards - drove the production of the IASC Gender Handbook for
Humanitarian Action: Women, Girls, Boys and Men, Different Needs -
Equal Opportunities. The IASC Gender Handbook lays the foundation
for updating the IASC's policy on gender equality in 2007 and provides
sector-specific guidance to humanitarian actors on how to mainstream
gender issues into humanitarian action.
In 2007, OCHA will report on progress made implementing its gender
action plan 2005-2006, and will put together a 2007-2008 plan
encompassing OCHA's field and headquarters offices. This new gender
action plan will place particular focus on strengthening OCHA's support
to mainstreaming gender issues as a cross-cutting theme in cluster
approach as well as enhancing partnership building between and among
all humanitarian actors.
Against this background, GAT's key objectives for 2007 are as follows:
Improved tools and services: The GAT will ensure that the Handbook on gender standards is
rolled out to the field. It will be translated into Arabic, French,
Russian and Spanish and accompanied by a CD-Rom with related resource
materials. The Handbook will provide indicator checklists to measure
the implementation of gender mainstreaming in an emergency. The GAT
will also promote the deployment of gender advisors in emergencies.
This initiative will develop a ready pool of trained gender experts
to be deployed to a humanitarian crisis on short notice. These experts
could be deployed as an "inter-agency" gender advisor providing gender
expertise to Humanitarian Coordinators or as agency specific gender
advisors. The gender pool will be trained on how to facilitate gender
mainstreaming in a humanitarian situation.
Greater engagement and coordination with national and
international NGOs: The GAT will promote capacity building of humanitarian actors on
gender issues through the development of an e-learning interactive
training course similar to the UN Basic Security Training. Because
a majority of humanitarian actors never receive training or are
deployed to an emergency with short start-up times, a CD-Rom or
internet-based learning course on gender would enable staff to
learn gender basics and how to operationalise gender concerns in
emergencies. The Gender Learning Programme could be used by all
partners as a basic entry-level training. The Gender Handbook will
provide the foundation for this effort. The GAT will also build
partnerships for increased predictability of gender programming in
crisis. When Flash Appeals or CAPs are prepared gender issues are
not always included. More concerted effort is needed to create a
programmatic approach which includes projects that incorporate gender
concerns and in some cases are specific efforts to support women/girls.
Consultations with NGO partners will be held to prepare project
"templates" and agree on standards to incorporate gender activitities
in funding appeals.
Strengthened in-country coordination: The GAT will promote the
use of sex & age disaggregated data for decision-making. Many Security
Council and Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) resolutions call for
the disaggregation of data by age and sex, although this does not
often happen. A more convincing argument is needed as well as more
practical guidance to decision-makers at field and HQ levels in order
to demonstrate how data disaggregated by age and sex is more effective
in understanding populations affected by crisis and to what degree
women's, men's, boys' and girls' needs are being met in an emergency.
A thorough review of recent emergency responses will be undertaken
to determine the use of sex and age disaggregated data for decision
making. This combined with solid examples of how data - both disaggregated
and not - makes a difference in the way a humanitarian situation
is understood, will be presented in a user-friendly tool for
Humanitarian Coordinators and others.
Key Indicators for 2007
- Percentage of OCHA field offices with gender action plans and report on annual implementation
- Percentage of OCHA offices supporting the creation of gender networks in the field and supporting them to use and roll out the IASC Gender Handbook
- Establishment of the Gender Roster in 2007; number of gender advisors deployed

|
|