Regional Offices
Each OCHA Regional Office has its own history, priorities and
specific activities. The raison d'être for all of them, however, is
based on the assumption that as regional structures they bring an
added value to the effectiveness of humanitarian assistance, be it
as support to country offices or by addressing coordination,
preparedness and advocacy issues for which a regional approach is
warranted.
OCHA Regional Offices have added enormously to the
effectiveness of OCHA's work by:
a) Taking a regional approach
to analysing humanitarian needs: analysing all types of crises
(conflict-related, health- related, environmental and natural
disasters) from a regional perspective, which allows a more holistic
view and adds weight and substance to advocacy strategies as well as
to regional preparedness planning.
b) Facilitating regional
disaster preparedness/contingency planning: disasters or complex
emergencies rarely affect a single country. OCHA Regional Offices
initiate and coordinate preparedness activities that go beyond the
borders of any one single country.
c) Acting as resource centres
for technical advice in national disaster preparedness planning:
especially in regions where OCHA does not have, or only has very
little, country presence, the OCHA Regional Offices act as advisory
centres for in-county disaster preparedness. Supporting national
preparedness planning for Avian and Human Influenza or for natural
disasters such as cyclones or floods are practical examples of this
type of activity.
d) Mobilising and providing knowledgeable
surge capacity to Country Teams in the region: with the staff's
specific knowledge of the region and its proximity, Regional Offices
manage to deploy or mobilize immediate and effective surge capacity.
Coordination Snapshot from West Africa
Speaking to a colleague in
the Regional Office in Dakar one day in October this year, she
mentioned that, "again today, media notes from our colleagues in
Côte d'Ivoire are reflecting tensions in Abidjan". She added that
other early warning indicators had also just been analysed by the
sub-regional emergency working group and that the conclusion was,
"the 'CDI+5' contingency planning process must be reactivated. This
is the priority now! We have to review our inter-agency preparedness
plan in case of major troubles in Cote d'Ivoire." A teleconference
is immediately organised to discuss the issue with the relevant
colleagues and counterparts. It is decided that the sub-regional
task force chaired by the WFP Regional Office must prioritise
interactions with the Humanitarian Coordinator in Cote d'Ivoire and
Resident Coordinators in surrounding countries to jointly review the
potential worst-case scenario. She noted that, "Our main expectation
is:
a) to reach a consensus on planning figures related to potential
caseloads of refugees, returnees, evacuees and third country
nationals so that each humanitarian country team prepares itself in
coherence with the rest of the affected countries; and
b) to agree
on a calendar and deadlines for updating the plans and consolidating
both draft CERF applications and the Flash Appeal."
Natural hazard maps for Asia and the Pacific
The Regional Office for Asia and the
Pacific (ROAP) is using innovative map products to analyse disaster
risks across the region. The maps show more clearly than ever before
how natural hazards such as earthquakes, volcanoes, flooding and
tropical storms affect the region. "It's the first time disaster
information for the region has been presented comprehensively in
this way," explains the OCHA Regional Information Management Officer
in Bangkok. "Looking at the data visually allows us to observe
patterns and trends that weren't noticeable before."
The maps are
being widely distributed to partners in the region, including UN
Agencies, NGOs and donors. The Regional Office is working with OCHA
country offices to develop detailed country-level maps and other
Regional Offices have shown an interest in creating similar
products.
The maps have also inspired the public at large, with
thousands of downloads recorded from websites such as reliefweb.int
and ochaonline.un.org/roap. Reuters recently praised the maps in a
news story published on its 'AlertNet' website. Large-format
versions of the maps have also been used to good effect in
exhibitions and conferences explaining OCHA's work in the region and
a number of schools have shown an interest in using the maps in the
classroom.
"We've received very positive feedback on the maps and
useful comments on ways to develop them further," says OCHA's Craig
Williams. "In response to demand we're planning to develop maps
showing seasonal variations in natural disaster risks, as well as
vulnerability mapping, which will take factors such as population
density into account."
Regional Scenario Development Workshops
Twice
a year, the Regional Office in Nairobi holds what has come to be
called a Regional Scenario Development Workshop for each of the two
regions the office works in: the Great Lakes Region and the Horn of
Africa. This year, the timing for the workshops faced severe
constraints due to the UN Climate Change Conference that was held at
the same time in Nairobi. Our staff from the Regional Office was
forced to organize two workshops, one for each region lasting 2-3
days, in one week.
The Regional Scenario Development Workshops
initially evolved from regional contingency planning exercises. It
was felt amongst stakeholders that in both regions the aim should
not be to work on actual contingency plans at the regional level but
to concentrate on scenario development which would then feed into
more practically oriented national contingency plans. The objective
of the exercise is to provide country teams and regional partners,
including donors, with consensus visions of alternate future
environments within which humanitarian action is expected to be
programmed. Needless to say, the ultimate objective is to improve
the effectiveness of planning and delivering humanitarian services
in the region.
The Regional Scenario Development Workshops are
unique fora at the regional level that gather a wide representation
of UN and NGO partners from the country and regional offices, as
well as donor and government representatives.
Therefore, "instead of
only looking at scenario development, we try to capitalize on the
presence of all these partners and carry out more in-depth analysis
of particular themes of interest in the region." One such theme has
recently been to look at the grey areas of transition, moving from
'pure' relief to recovery and longer-term sustainable development.
"For this we are asking: 'what kinds of activities are appropriate
for each humanitarian mandate and agency during the various stages
of crisis?'" A simulation exercise is being planned to look at this
question specifically.
Every year, feedback has been very positive.
The workshops have been hailed as "a best practice in information
management and in early warning". Its organization is a big team
effort for the Regional Office. "With participants coming from a
variety of mandates, sectors and from a range of capacities and
resources," says our focal point, "the workshops have to have added
value for each single participant."
Surge Capacity deployments
Hurricane Ivan was the strongest hurricane of the 2004 Atlantic
hurricane season and caused major damage and destruction throughout
the Caribbean. Ivan reached Category 5 strength on the Hurricane
Scale, the highest possible category, and it was at that time the
sixth (now the ninth) most intense Atlantic hurricane on record. In
September, with Ivan fast approaching the island of Jamaica, the
OCHA Regional Disaster Response Advisor led the pre-deployment of a
5-member UNDAC team to prepare for the emergency. The objective of
the pre-deployment was to establish an On-Site Operations
Coordination Center (OSOCC) and to support the UN Resident
Coordinator and the UN Disaster Management Team in coordinating
activities with the different national authorities and national and
international humanitarian actors.
The team was in place two days
before Hurricane Ivan took its toll and had already set up an
operations room in their hotel. The day following the passing of
Ivan, as the Prime Minister was declaring a state of emergency, the
UNDAC team was operational - carrying out flight assessments,
coordinating from the hotel operations center, and establishing the
UNDAC Airport Reception Centre for the registry of the relief
workers and relief cargo. Cooperation in the areas of logistics and
personnel at the parish level proved to be particularily effective.
Meanwhile, the rest of the staff at the Regional Office in Panama
coordinated information and response activities at the regional
level with the Risk, Emergency and Disaster Taskforce for Latin
America and the Caribbean (REDLAC). The OCHA Regional Office acts as
Executive Secretary for this group, which is formed by regional UN
Agencies, NGOs, and other partners located in Panama. REDLAC has
created a platform for the exchange of information, joint planning,
and joint actions to optimize prevention and response actions to
more effectively mitigate the suffering of vulnerable populations
affected by natural disasters in the region.
In total, Hurricane
Ivan affected 350,000 people and caused 15 deaths along with almost
US$ 600 million in damage in Jamaica. However, the UNDAC
pre-deployment and preparedness activities of the OCHA Regional
Office, as well as the shared information and joint activities among
the REDLAC group, are strongly believed to have reduced the impact.

|